Could a tyre war make Formula 1 more interesting?

Pirelli's compounds have been causing problems for some time now. Until now, these problems have mainly been circumvented by making adjustments elsewhere or introducing a new compound. In 2021, the cars will have to drive with less downforce to spare the tyres.

Multiple tyre suppliers cause unpredictability

Isn't it a better idea to let other manufacturers make their (re)entry? During the late nineties and the early years after 2000 we saw Goodyear, Bridgestone and Michelin and how such a tyre war could turn out. Because each manufacturer has different ideas, the other is also forced to be on top of their game. It also creates unpredictable strategies, as competing teams can drive with a completely different type of tyre.

Introducing such an element of unpredictability would eliminate the need for certain rule changes that are often done to make the whole thing a little more exciting. Also, the whole range of soft compounds could be thrown out. This has now gone so far out of hand that only the hard, medium and soft compounds are distinguished.

Notorious Michelin boycott in 2005

Of course, there are also disadvantages to a tyre war. We all remember the 2005 United States Grand Prix, in which only six cars competed. Due to problems with the Michelin tyres, which could not be solved without creating a disadvantage for competitor Bridgestone, the teams with Michelin tyres decided not to participate. Of course, such a situation cannot be repeated.

In addition, teams would run the risk of choosing the 'wrong' tyre manufacturer. If one is more successful than the other, it could become a decisive factor in victories, or even the championship.

In any case, it's time to change the tyre situation in Formula 1, and the problems it causes. But given the upcoming drastic rule changes in 2022, a tyre war may not be necessary at all.