At Ferrari, after three Grand Prix in 2022, everything seemed to indicate that it was going to be a special year for the Tifosi. The lead in both championships over Red Bull Racing was huge and Charles Leclerc's form was in great shape. Four races later, however, the Italians are already in pursuit of Red Bull Racing.
At Ferrari, they have one of the strongest duos behind the wheel. Carlos Sainz, meanwhile, has seven seasons of Formula 1 experience, while Charles Leclerc has already proven himself as a multiple race winner. Mattia Binotto is also very enthusiastic about his driver duo, especially the Monegasque.
"We knew Charles had very high potential. When we put him in our car in 2019, he proved in the first season to be very strong and talented," explained the Ferrari team boss at the BBC. According to Binotto, it was immediately apparent from his driving style and his way of attacking and defending that he has a lot going for him.
Still, the Italians were cautious about Leclerc at the time, as it was, after all, only his second season in Formula One at the time. "I think, as the seasons passed, it gave us the confidence he could do that and would become a fantastic driver. We are confident he could be a driver who can win world championships and become a very strong leader for the team."
There's 2 things that will defeat Charles this year. 1- Ferrari pitwall 2- RB having the fastest car. Both out with Charles's control
Ferrari have the fastest car and by far like we saw in evry race of the season if you look at red bull wins they all come from luck not pace , in Saudi Arabia the vsc gave max the win , in imola and Miami tier deg gave max the win , in Spain the engine problem and in Monaco the Ferrari stupid mistake , Ferrari will learn from the mistakes and improve, max and red bulls luck will end and when that happens thier is no stopping Charles
So going by that max has been the luckiest driver, I agree with that and I also hope that Ferrari do sort out their problems, if not they would be aswell just giving both trophies to RB.
Well based on the data from the speed trap and measuring of the maximum speed this cannot be concluded, so I am curious on what information source you base the claim that Red Bull has tge fastest car?
No source just my opinion jem, I haven't seen all the data from speed traps etc. The RB just looks like the overall better/faster race package, plus the fact that they(RB) are still on their first engine is quite alarming aswell, the picture will be clearer after Silverstone when all the big upgrades have been fitted.
Looking at the data from speed traps, Ferrari was slower than RB by 12km/h in Imola, 10km/h in Miami and 5km/h in Spain, after their big upgrades. They gain in slower corners, but RB also improved in the area lately. Top speed deficit means problems in Baku and Canada. They also have problems with drag, which means Monza and Suzuka will be most likely lost for Ferrari. They are also suffering in hot temperature, so Hungary will also be tough for them. Out of all remaining races, Singapore is the only one that should fit Ferrari more than RB. Reliability problems mean at least a couple grid penalties in the future. I wouldn't really agree Max was lucky. Spain was team orders, that has nothing to do with luck. Imola and Miami RB was simply much better. Monaco was more lucky for Checo. At the beggining of the season RB had problems with car set up, very narrow window for changes. They made huge mistake with it in Australia, as they admitted themselves. They improved that as well. I agree that overall RB is a better car, slightly faster and better suited for most tracks.
Yeah, SC really ruined Checo's race in Saudi Arabia. He looked like he had everything under control before that. In Miami he would probably be 2nd if not for engine problems. Max was lucky with Leclerc's DNF in Spain, especially because this will haunt Ferrari later in the season with grid penalties, so it's worse than just 0 points. Ferrari is in tough situation, hopefully the upgrades will work well for them. Fingers crossed.
Your speed trap numbers just confirmed what my thoughts are with RB having the faster car/package. I completely agree with you Hekate, as for the luck I was referring to max got lucky in Saudi with the SC scenario ( checo should've won) he also got lucky in Spain with Charles dnf (checo should've won without team orders) and got even more lucky in Monte Carlo with Ferrari screwing up Charles race and putting him behind max. I would maybe put interlagos along with Singapore that will suit the Ferrari more than the RB, so that would be 2 or maybe 3 out of the remaining 15 races that suit the scuderia which is a tall order for Charles but I'm sure he is well and truly ready for the challenge. Great post by the way Hekate ?
Thanks for the input. This is feedback that I can really appreciate. I agree, Red Bull did improve a lot since the first races and if they can continue this I think they will become the favorite for the WDC. But I fear that a certain point in the season, Red Bull will become very limited in the updates they can bring. And this might become an advantage for Ferrari. Reliability problem might indeed more likely be an issue for Ferrari and thus grid penalities. Hopefully they can avoid, but it doesn't look promissing. The tyre degradation is something where Red Bull seems to have the upper hand and that could really become issues for Ferrari if they do not find a solution. Because that means Red Bull can afford to start second or third, but still compete for the victory because they can push longer than Ferrari (like happened in the sprint race of Imola and in Miami).
Charles is definitely talented and fast enough to win titles for Ferrari, but is Ferrari competent enough to give him the backing needed to win? ..... That is the real question.