+0
22-11-2023 17:02
12-09-2023 16:09
19-07-2023 13:47
19-07-2023 13:36
04-07-2023 13:54
17-06-2023 20:11
27-05-2023 20:51
29-04-2023 17:23
08-04-2023 21:40
06-04-2023 19:14
+0
Lukasz8585
this man is so tight that no one can beat him!!! manhole cover damaging the floor, monocoque and driver's seat is nothing? ferarri clearly defined the damage. THE DRIVER'S SEAT AND THE MONOCOCK BREAKED FROM THE FORCE OF IMPACT! but the floor in a Mercedes is an incredible threat to a crying prima donna performing a theater play with a sore back! then Wolf fought for the drivers' health, or rather to weaken his rivals, lobbying once again for changes in his favor.22-11-2023 17:02
+0
Lukasz8585
so what level is Hamilton if he got a verstappen in comparable machines? . If you're going to write your rubbish just to spark a controversial discussion, it's better to remain silent12-09-2023 16:09
+0
Lukasz8585
https://the-race.com/formula-1/red-bull-more-dominant-than-mercedes-was-hamilton-claim-tested/ read the raw calculations and stop embarrassing yourself with your arguments!!! I already wrote to you once that you make up your own stories and you have no idea about racing and certainly not about F119-07-2023 13:47
+0
Lukasz8585
instead of talking to your imaginary paddock friends you should read a valuable article at least once!!! Mark Hughes there exactly calculated the advantage of Mercedes from the years of domination and Red Bull. stop adding your own threads to the story to suit your own theories19-07-2023 13:36
+0
Lukasz8585
unfortunately max is now following in Hamilton's footsteps from last week and trying to change the rules for his own convenience. although Hamilton wanted a mid-season rule change. probably out of habit....04-07-2023 13:54
+0
Lukasz8585
in Barcelona that year, Mercedes was also high compared to previous races. I would wait at least 3 races and then you can tell if Mercedes has improved17-06-2023 20:11
+0
Lukasz8585
did you really see that moment? it must have been amazing. master ! everyone saw this moment because it was broadcast by TV ? so as usual....27-05-2023 20:51
+0
Lukasz8585
in brazil you said something else toto when verstapen dove on the inside29-04-2023 17:23
+0
Lukasz8585
the change in 2021 introducing a minimum reaction time was not dictated by safety !!!! this idea was submitted by mercedes using the safety rule. because only in this case, that is when it comes to safety, the FIA can change the rules without consulting the teams and the right of veto. the introduction of this was only supposed to slow down redbull's pit stops, but then because mercedes was losing on this level08-04-2023 21:40
+0
Lukasz8585
of course, this is another statement from the mercedes team regarding the rules!!! first promoting the thesis that redbul has gained an incredible advantage, and that the current rules do not live up to their promises. this is nothing more than setting the stage for another media campaign to put pressure on the FIA for rule changes. i'm waiting for british sky to join this and we'll have exactly what it was last year when mercedes first introduced the story to the media about finishing and then together with sky went full propaganda with the finale of all this comedy in the gas tank and the theatrical performance of hamilton getting out of the car . only after a year pat symonds admitted that the rule change was hasty and guided by the opinion of one team that for the race in the gas tank probably deliberately set the cars in extreme settings06-04-2023 19:14