+3
03-04-2025 00:47
+1
31-03-2025 14:57
+0
27-03-2025 07:38
27-03-2025 15:52
27-03-2025 17:55
27-03-2025 07:30
27-03-2025 01:46
27-03-2025 02:12
27-02-2025 23:13
+3
jess19
Always justifying someone else poor performance, as if engineers will willingly neglect one car and score less points to get less money.03-04-2025 00:47
+1
jess19
He's an idiot just ignore him. Someone told me to do the same thing31-03-2025 14:57
+0
jess19
in f1 you must reduce the gap to your teammate that's just what is expected from both pilots. The car had the pace and Checo did not impress anyone tbh. And the second car is the same one Max drives and compete for podiums that checo failed to do affter Japan 24.27-03-2025 07:38
+0
jess19
And this is what the chief designer said https://www.sportskeeda.com/f1/news-what-want-almost-always-same-adrian-newey-dispels-notion-max-verstappen-peculiar-demand-car. I am an engineer and It baffles me when I read takes like designing a car for a driver, this just shows the lack of understanding of many even experts in the sport that don't know what they're talking about27-03-2025 15:52
+0
jess19
Okay I am clearly wasting my time, Should have known better who I was interacting with. Goodbye27-03-2025 17:55
+0
jess19
redbull car is not "Max centric" this very notion goes against motorsport logic, and the story of the "2nd car' is just a made up one to accept or justify poor performance.27-03-2025 07:30
+0
jess19
That's not really how f1 works27-03-2025 01:46
+0
jess19
Its not helpful when f1 pundits spread the same garbage driving style thing. I wish people can understand how motorsport works and how f1 cars are designed.27-03-2025 02:12
+0
jess19
He can't answer a question if he's asked?27-02-2025 23:13