GreatestLoserOfAllTime
+3720Laatste reacties
Popular on GPBlog
1
Japan GP Weather forecast: Will it be a rainy Sunday in Suzuka?
2619 times read
2
Verstappen exposes massive holes in Norris' repeated title claims
1384 times read
3
F1 LIVE | Follow the wet and THRILLING 2025 Japanese Grand Prix live here!
1379 times read
4
Verstappen receives compliment from Hill after great pole in Japan
1065 times read
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
The critique is running really, really thin if #Tw@tterTeamLH needs to use examples like this in an attempt to damage a character. Truth is this was not a competition, it was an organized race between friends-of-friends. No prizes to be won, no points to be earned, it was a casual racegame where stuff like this happens all the time. So next time Max & Lando play a 1st person shooter, Max will be called a murderer, lol. Not Norris of course, just Max. Meanwhile, back in reality, Karma is catching up fast :)17-07-2023 14:57
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
"The best man..." Who's getting married? (Also, translate from Dutch much? xD)05-07-2023 06:19
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
FREC? 1 word: "Stenshorne" (Definitely not Wurz).03-07-2023 15:29
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
"His team should have" They did, he had more than enough time to react, 100% driver error from #44. Also applies to him not being able to keep it between the lines btw, or is that to be blamed on the team as well? "no matter what you think Lewis did" No need to dream up a narrative you've read on Tw@tter, the actual footage speaks for itself. "Your definition of an eye for and eye is incorrect" Love how you continue to make out your flawed opinions to be incorrect facts. At least your consistent, not something to be said about #44, Look it up, you might learn a thing or 2 about your own native tongue. "Eye for an eye" is the basic principle of 'lex talionis', first introduced by Babylonian law iirc. What you are referencing is nothing more than an individual philosophical rhetoric that, if I had to guess, is the first hit you got when you googled it. I'm not calling you stupid btw, just saying you lack a lot of basic knowledge. "I'm being toxic?" Glad to see you agree, it's a start. "So if Max's revenge block is ok with you then so should the Merc fans retaliations be." You're trying so hard to polarize, seems you could have added a couple of superlatives about the #TeamLH there, missed opportunity, shame on you, I hope they don't start cancelling you. And why so full of yourself? Lewis didn't block me, neither did MV block you; they blocked each other. Which imo made for some exciting television and was one of the rare moments where #44 was actually a little bit relevant to the front runners last weekend.05-07-2023 06:13
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
Don't mind laughing at your emotional babbling per sé, but this is way too long to even start reading.06-07-2023 15:48
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
#44 was ready to go and warned by radio ("Verstappen is coming through, GO! GO NOW!"), yet he decided to faff about just that little longer. So what are you thinking, that Lewis was trying to give Max a tow, to compensate for all that trouble Red Bull has with top speed and DRS this year? Can I get some more pink fairy dust to go alongside with that? Even funnier, the actual definition of "eye for an eye" is; -> The principle of justice that requires punishment equal in kind to the offense (not greater than the offense, as was frequently given in ancient times). You're being toxic, as any good member of #TeamLH should. All that happened was a front runner asserting a little dominance over some slow-poke on the back of the grid, driving around like no rookie should. What else is new in F1? You?04-07-2023 10:13
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
Love the whole "intentional" vs "unintentional" angle here, it's hilarious xD I thought the goat never makes mistakes? I was watching #44 on-board + radio calls when it happened, he knew all too well #1 was coming at speed. Imo, in this case, eye for an eye. Nobody got hurt and nothing of value was lost in Q3, so let the boys have some fun on track in stead of crying Wolff in front of the cameras / Connelly.02-07-2023 06:10
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
To be fair, nothing of value was lost in Q302-07-2023 06:15
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
For the record, ML has stated they want clarification over anything else. Having said that, afaik a right to review always start with a team being required to hand over 'new evidence' related to the incident. I for one hope rolling starts get simplified a little, especially in tricky conditions. Can't imagine anyone giving a flying F about 10 or 15 car lengths difference? Constant pace, warm tires and visibility seems much more important, safety wise. And yes, there's an advantage for first car deciding when to hit the throttle, just like there's advantage for having a tow.02-07-2023 06:28
+0
GreatestLoserOfAllTime
Ludo van Denderen. GPblog only lists the author name with the original article, in this case the Dutch version. This in turn might also explain all the google-translate titles we get over on this side... And I agree, this column is ridiculous.03-11-2022 06:31