2025 is the last year of racing with the current technical regulations. Once the 2026 Formula 1 season begins, everything will be turned upside down, forcing teams to start from scratch again. Red Bull technical director Pierre Waché is happy with the progress on their 2026 challenger, but still sees room for improvement.
2026 will see a complete overhaul of the technical regulations. As a result, teams face an interesting challenge next year: finding the balance between continuing to develop the 2025 car and developing the 2026 car.
With the new regulations, we get a smaller chassis, active aerodynamics and a more sustainable engine. In addition, the powerplant will run on fully sustainable fuel.
Where teams had considerable design freedom in the past, this is no longer the case. Indeed, more and more regulations are being added, making it harder for engineers to come up with innovative solutions to problems. For 2026, however, the FIA has decided to loosen the reins slightly, allowing a bit more leeway.
"It has been improved, quite a lot improved," Waché told Motorsport.com. "The combination of chassis and engine just remains hugely challenging in terms of characteristics, but that's the same for everyone."
The Technical Director is not sure whether the combination of the two will work well, but chooses to focus on making the most of the regulations in front of them. He said: "It is also too late now to discuss that. Even if the speed profile and experiences for the drivers are not what we would like to see from Formula 1, it is purely our job to build the fastest package. As a result, I no longer focus on what I personally think of the new rules."
"In my view, it does not make sense to come up with an engine that cannot work in the current cars." However, it is not entirely surprising that this has happened. Indeed, in an attempt to attract new engine suppliers towards the sport, the FIA has focused on the engine regulations. After all, engines take much more time to develop.
The aerodynamics and other mechanical regulations were then subsequently amended, some may say as an afterthought. As a result, the two do not fit well together. Waché would therefore have preferred things to be different.
Still, the Technical Director is keen to make something beautiful out of it. "I think it can still be a good show," he says. He adds that it is also not up to him to ensure that everything in the sport gets better, and that he is operating purely from Red Bull Racing 's perspective and that is where his priority lies. "I just have to do my job myself to the best of my ability and make sure that the people in the team can work to the best of their ability to ultimately deliver the best car. That is the only thing I get paid for."
This article was written in collaboration with James Fiorucci.
Want more Formula 1? Then follow GPblog on our various social media channels!
X | Instagram | Tiktok | YouTube
Other teams have just got on with it while RBR whinge and moan because the rules wernen't written to suit them or don't appear to be suiting them, remember RBR poaching quite a few engine guys from the benchmark engine manufacturer and they still aren't happy, must be rueing why they doubled the wages of most of them. Anyway it doesn't matter how slower or faster you are so long as your matched quite evenly, karting isn't fast but its even, lawnmower racing isn't fast but if your evenly matched then its fun. From the noises I'm hearing and from reading these negative articles from Redbull it appears they aren't where they need to be and are going to be left behind, karma as Mavric keeps saying
"Other teams have just got on with it while RBR whinge and moan because the rules wernen't written to suit them....." absolutely ? on point Doink
Well it's just RedBull that's been really so negative about the 2026 regulations. The other teams have voiced that they have challenges yes but have gotten along with development ? VI ?
"The other teams have voiced that they have challenges" That's exactly what Waché said. Did you at least read the article before commenting? "but have gotten along with development" What tells you that this isn't the case with RB too? Did you get the famous"inside information" again? Funny though, even Newey is not happy about the 2026 PU regulations. You have no understanding of the 2026 PU engineering. Would you, you would be quieter in this regard. But yeah, it's about RB, perfect reason for you to spread misinformation.